CRP Work-Application Failure TSG
The ClusterResourcePlacementApplied
condition is set to false
when the deployment fails.
Note: To get more information about why the resources are not applied, you can check the work applier logs.
Common scenarios
Instances where this condition may arise:
- The resource already exists on the cluster and isn’t managed by the fleet controller.
- Another
ClusterResourcePlacement
deployment is already managing the resource for the selected cluster by using a different apply strategy. - The
ClusterResourcePlacement
deployment doesn’t apply the manifest because of syntax errors or invalid resource configurations. This might also occur if a resource is propagated through an envelope object.
Investigation steps
- Check
placementStatuses
: In theClusterResourcePlacement
status section, inspect theplacementStatuses
to identify which clusters have theResourceApplied
condition set tofalse
and note down theirclusterName
. - Locate the
Work
Object in Hub Cluster: Use the identifiedclusterName
to locate theWork
object associated with the member cluster. Please refer to this section to learn how to get the correctWork
resource. - Check
Work
object status: Inspect the status of theWork
object to understand the specific issues preventing successful resource application.
Case Study
In the following example, ClusterResourcePlacement
is trying to propagate a namespace that contains a deployment to two member clusters. However, the namespace already exists on one member cluster, specifically kind-cluster-1
.
ClusterResourcePlacement spec
policy:
clusterNames:
- kind-cluster-1
- kind-cluster-2
placementType: PickFixed
resourceSelectors:
- group: ""
kind: Namespace
name: test-ns
version: v1
revisionHistoryLimit: 10
strategy:
type: RollingUpdate
ClusterResourcePlacement status
status:
conditions:
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: could not find all the clusters needed as specified by the scheduling
policy
observedGeneration: 1
reason: SchedulingPolicyUnfulfilled
status: "False"
type: ClusterResourcePlacementScheduled
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: All 2 cluster(s) start rolling out the latest resource
observedGeneration: 1
reason: RolloutStarted
status: "True"
type: ClusterResourcePlacementRolloutStarted
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: No override rules are configured for the selected resources
observedGeneration: 1
reason: NoOverrideSpecified
status: "True"
type: ClusterResourcePlacementOverridden
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: Works(s) are succcesfully created or updated in the 2 target clusters'
namespaces
observedGeneration: 1
reason: WorkSynchronized
status: "True"
type: ClusterResourcePlacementWorkSynchronized
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: Failed to apply resources to 1 clusters, please check the `failedPlacements`
status
observedGeneration: 1
reason: ApplyFailed
status: "False"
type: ClusterResourcePlacementApplied
observedResourceIndex: "0"
placementStatuses:
- clusterName: kind-cluster-2
conditions:
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: 'Successfully scheduled resources for placement in kind-cluster-2 (affinity
score: 0, topology spread score: 0): picked by scheduling policy'
observedGeneration: 1
reason: Scheduled
status: "True"
type: Scheduled
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: Detected the new changes on the resources and started the rollout process
observedGeneration: 1
reason: RolloutStarted
status: "True"
type: RolloutStarted
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: No override rules are configured for the selected resources
observedGeneration: 1
reason: NoOverrideSpecified
status: "True"
type: Overridden
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: All of the works are synchronized to the latest
observedGeneration: 1
reason: AllWorkSynced
status: "True"
type: WorkSynchronized
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: All corresponding work objects are applied
observedGeneration: 1
reason: AllWorkHaveBeenApplied
status: "True"
type: Applied
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:49Z"
message: The availability of work object crp-4-work is not trackable
observedGeneration: 1
reason: WorkNotTrackable
status: "True"
type: Available
- clusterName: kind-cluster-1
conditions:
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: 'Successfully scheduled resources for placement in kind-cluster-1 (affinity
score: 0, topology spread score: 0): picked by scheduling policy'
observedGeneration: 1
reason: Scheduled
status: "True"
type: Scheduled
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: Detected the new changes on the resources and started the rollout process
observedGeneration: 1
reason: RolloutStarted
status: "True"
type: RolloutStarted
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: No override rules are configured for the selected resources
observedGeneration: 1
reason: NoOverrideSpecified
status: "True"
type: Overridden
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: All of the works are synchronized to the latest
observedGeneration: 1
reason: AllWorkSynced
status: "True"
type: WorkSynchronized
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: Work object crp-4-work is not applied
observedGeneration: 1
reason: NotAllWorkHaveBeenApplied
status: "False"
type: Applied
failedPlacements:
- condition:
lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: 'Failed to apply manifest: failed to process the request due to a
client error: resource exists and is not managed by the fleet controller
and co-ownernship is disallowed'
reason: ManifestsAlreadyOwnedByOthers
status: "False"
type: Applied
kind: Namespace
name: test-ns
version: v1
selectedResources:
- kind: Namespace
name: test-ns
version: v1
- group: apps
kind: Deployment
name: test-nginx
namespace: test-ns
version: v1
In the ClusterResourcePlacement
status, within the failedPlacements
section for kind-cluster-1
, we get a clear message
as to why the resource failed to apply on the member cluster. In the preceding conditions
section,
the Applied
condition for kind-cluster-1
is flagged as false and shows the NotAllWorkHaveBeenApplied
reason.
This indicates that the Work object intended for the member cluster kind-cluster-1
has not been applied.
For more information, see this section.
Work status of kind-cluster-1
status:
conditions:
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: 'Apply manifest {Ordinal:0 Group: Version:v1 Kind:Namespace Resource:namespaces
Namespace: Name:test-ns} failed'
observedGeneration: 1
reason: WorkAppliedFailed
status: "False"
type: Applied
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: ""
observedGeneration: 1
reason: WorkAppliedFailed
status: Unknown
type: Available
manifestConditions:
- conditions:
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: 'Failed to apply manifest: failed to process the request due to a client
error: resource exists and is not managed by the fleet controller and co-ownernship
is disallowed'
reason: ManifestsAlreadyOwnedByOthers
status: "False"
type: Applied
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: Manifest is not applied yet
reason: ManifestApplyFailed
status: Unknown
type: Available
identifier:
kind: Namespace
name: test-ns
ordinal: 0
resource: namespaces
version: v1
- conditions:
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:40Z"
message: Manifest is already up to date
observedGeneration: 1
reason: ManifestAlreadyUpToDate
status: "True"
type: Applied
- lastTransitionTime: "2024-05-07T23:32:51Z"
message: Manifest is trackable and available now
observedGeneration: 1
reason: ManifestAvailable
status: "True"
type: Available
identifier:
group: apps
kind: Deployment
name: test-nginx
namespace: test-ns
ordinal: 1
resource: deployments
version: v1
From looking at the Work
status, specifically the manifestConditions
section, you can see that the namespace could not be applied but the deployment within the namespace got propagated from the hub to the member cluster.
Resolution
In this situation, a potential solution is to set the AllowCoOwnership
to true
in the ApplyStrategy policy. However, it’s important to notice that this decision should be made by the user because the resources might not be shared.
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can further improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can fix the experience for you.